Make a joyful noise!(?)
Getting past the literal wording of the passage and just considering those first four words, 'Make a joyful noise': is that more an ambiguous license or a specifically desired expectation?
Considering the more abstract possibilities, I'm drawn to the thought of a joyful noise being in the range of a frequency and amplitude that is symbiotic, if not synergistic, with our sublime host, 'The Lord'. If so, and NOT a cacophonous diversity, then how I'd describe the present physic-of-reality as a multitudinous collective of tangent appendages spiking in different heights, angles, and locales off a spherical core-a subconscious virus-like depiction of mine-would be more as a virus. Those spikes' collateral effects on the surrounding environment are inherently invasive because of the demographic density of proximity on the topographical surface of the sphere.
I also believe that beyond the license of diverse propagation possible, there's a particular strain of 'spike' that is closer to the essence of the progenitor source and likely to be more fundamentally durable than the other spikes. Those other spikes have their own cast-of-existence that could last through multiple generations of reproductions, but still be only uniquely interesting anecdotal phenomena to the progenitor core. In the meantime, the strain of essence spike has the eternal features of that core that closely resonate with the exhorted for "joyful noise".
Bringing it from the abstract physic to its mundane analogy, there is an indefinite number of forms and content expression out there as 'spikes' of manifested creativeness. There could be a subset of forms that meet the symbiotic-to-synergistic qualities of resonant noises, while the others 'strut and fret their hour upon the stage to eventually be heard no more..'.
Thus, it may be that it's a function of functional structures than the more aesthetic value of moral biases, which could very well be a f(x) of their structure and its conditioning within the matrix of their chosen/designated cast, plus their inevitable and fated end-game. In that event, we exist in an empirical 'casino of chance probabilities'. Those probabilities are responses to our responses to the options of our choice of awareness. What becomes our cast of affinity has more to do with our utilitarian intentions that coincidentally could be in symbiotic to synergistic alignment within the range of frequencies and amplitudes of the 'joyful noise' of the host 'progenitor'.
If we happen to fall into that slot, much like the proverbial marble of a roulette wheel, then we'll be on a ride of grace that has nothing in-common with the other expressional spikes beyond the joint locale we share with the more temporally kinetic intentions of the other cohabitants of our time and space.
